|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| Mike Myers wants to turn it around and pull the serious bit, playing Keith Moon, former drummer of the Who in a full fledged biopic? Could that question have been longer? Yes! And rock on, Mr. Myers!
I think it's a great move. I think everyone would agree with me when I say that I'm tired of hearing his Scottish accident as a certain green thing, and I'm tired of seeing the four-eyed spy all over the place. Granted, he's still doing voice over work for Shrek 3 but for the money he's getting for that, I would, too.
You can't hate Mike Myers. Sure, his characters get old as hell, but as much as he shoved the character Austin Powers down America's throat, he created Austin Powers with his own bare hands. And you know there was a time that we all loved Austin Powers. Don't deny it. And if you never liked the character/movie, well, you're just special, aren't you?
And you can't hold Cat in the Hat against him. He got sued by Universal because he refused to make a shitty Sprockets movie. The only way he could get out of that movie - which definitely would've sucked, it's not that great of a character and does NOT belong in a movie - was if he did Cat in the Hat. He was put in a corner, folks. He was haunted by the film as much as you or I. Him, even more so, I'm sure.
I, for one, welcome Mike Myers to spread his wings into Keith Moon territory. Go ahead Mr. Myers, make us proud. | | |
| The Frankenstein Legacy Collection would not have been bought had it not been for a class. I watched the original Frankenstein today for the first time in probably ever and I did not enjoy myself. I mean, I guess it was okay. But seriously, there was nothing to the monster!
Now when I was about 10-12 years old, I got a whole bunch of those rewritten novels that were the big classics like Frankenstein, War of the Worlds, David Copperfield, etc but they had pictures and were a fraction of the size. The Frankenstein one, which is the only version of the book I ever read, I thought was awesome.
And I just remembered! In eighth grade, I read the real thing in its entirety and I loved the original book, too. Now I knew the movie was nothing like the book. All these reviews and everything went on to say "it captured the mood, the tone of the original. It is a faithful adaptation in that it keeps the theme alive." The fuck it does. This is quite possibly one of the worst adaptations EVAR. In my opinion anyway, which is not humble. I could go on to why I think that, but the subject depresses me. I'm just glad I can justify the thirty dollar purchase by saying "school necessities."
So now I'm stuck with this balls-to-the-wall D-DVD. It contains FIVE Frankenstein films: the original, Bride of, Son of, Ghost of, and House of Frankenstein. Plus, I already own Young (of) Frankenstein. Will I ever watch them all? ::shrugs:: ::how do these "::" mean action, by the way:: ::and in the last case, a thought...and in this case, a post script::
With six Frankenstein films in my grasp, I can hold a hardcore Frankenstein marathon. Wow, that would be a terrible idea. Well, off to the shelf it goes! Never to be seen or heard from again. | | |
| Back on track.
I've broken the cherry on Minimum Security. 5 pages in and it's feeling good. | | |
| There's something strange about watching the first episode of the American version of The Office. And the strangeness, this shit-ass deja-vu, comes only after having seen the British version first.
It is like an alternate dimension. Never before have I felt like I've experienced that. Actually watching a bizarro world. That is what watching the American version is like.
In case you didn't know (which you probably do [unless you didn't {but you might} shut up inner parenthesis {make me} I will! I'll just close my box and then you'll be done for! {You don't have the balls} Oh yea? {Yea, asshole}] Hey! Shut the fuck up out there! [...sorry {yea, sorry.}]) the first episode is 90% the exact same as the first episode of the British version. It's crammed in a little more and a few reference things are changed but for an enormous amount of the most part, it's exact! Line for line! It's so weird.
Needless to say, I didn't watch beyond that episode. That's all I needed to see. Whether or not it's good, I'm not really the one to ask. I'm jaded by the original. You would need to ask someone who's never seen it. Frankly, I think the comedy really missed the mark in most cases. Steve Carell was okay at some points and you can tell he was trying his best to make the character his own but that's hard when you have the SAME dialogue and they want to shoot it all exactly the SAME.
Anyway, disasters aside, I plan on holding a Coloring Book Social on my floor. Of course, I'm not holding it to socialize. I have ulterior motives, if that is how you spell that.
My plan is to start the sequel to "K93128" at this Social of Coloring Books. It will be fanta-astically excellent. | | |
| Yes. I am a dork. Wanna fight about it?
Olaf Glad (and Big) writes:
I bought Rushmore for a little over 15 dollars.
I bought a Whopper for a little over 3.
One whopper equals 1/5 of a Non-Special Edition Rushmore DVD?
There has to be some economic way to take advantage of this.
I commented back and stumbled upon the Rosetta Stone of iPod Theory!
Rushmore is 93 minutes. If we remember our handy-dandy conversion
factor, one minute is equal to about 8.33 photos. That means Rushmore
is worth 774.69 photos.
If a Whopper is equal to 1/5 of Rushmore, than age of the Whopper aside, a Whopper is worth 154.938 photos.
Now,
if a Whopper is worth "a little over 3 [dollars]", let's assume $3.05.
Now, for the FIRST TIME, we can convert photos to money! If 154.938
photos is equal to $3.05, then one dollar is worth about 50.79 photos.
A penny is worth about half a photo (.5079). Now this is very interesting! WHY? A picture (photo) is worth a thousand words.
Therefore
"my two cents" is equal to about a thousand words. If you want a penny
for someone's thoughts, you'll pay for up to a 507.9 words.
This post, including the words I am writing right now until the end, includes 169 words.
Photos required for this post: .169 photos
This post is worth 1/3 cents (or three haypennies).
Yes. You've read right. The iPod Photo Conversion Factor can now be converted to monetary value! How cool is that?
Using this exciting new exchange rate, let's find out - according to this factor - how much an iPod actually costs.
Well, if 50.79 photos is worth one dollar, a 20 gig iPod (which holds 5,000 songs) holds 125,000 photos. Whoo-boy!
Do a little math and you'll find a 125,000 photo (20 gig) iPod is
actually worth $2461.11. How much did you pay? $300-$400? Not so bad!
Of course, the fault in this is that we're assuming the cost of a
Burger King Whopper is the end-all be-all variable in finding out all
of this. We should find a constant we can all agree with. However, I'm
all for the Whopper being the variable. Something so simple and yet now
brings upon new levels of mathematics.
Finally, using this conversion factor, I'd like to point out that by
using my age (20 years, 4 months, 20 days old) in photos (roughly
622,206,019.2), apparently, I am WORTH $12,250,561.51. Don't worry, my
worth goes up every second of every day until I die. So I can be
optimistic about my worth by default.
Psss...
Know what that sound is? The sound of your mind being BLOWN!
| | |
|